Comments on: Jays go with Clayton up the middle http://www.baseballfiles.com/player-acquisitions/blue-jays/jays-go-with-clayton-up-the-middle/ Sun, 7 Sep 2008 16:14:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Sam Stevens http://www.baseballfiles.com/player-acquisitions/blue-jays/jays-go-with-clayton-up-the-middle/#comment-945 Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:28:47 +0000 http://www.baseballfiles.com/player-acquisitions/blue-jays/jays-go-with-clayton-up-the-middle/#comment-945 I know Clayton's recent stats don't look great, and I would certainly agree that he's not the ideal fit at SS for the Jays, nor is he the SS of the future. However, I do think that we look better at the position for this upcoming season with Clayton on board than without. Put it this way: Clayton wouldn't still be in baseball if he truly stunk. He's an average defender, with some speed around the base paths. Is his bat as bad as they say? His batting average is, well pretty average, and his OBP is not very good. But let's step outside the numbers for a minute... I listened to alot of Nationals games last season and Clayton came through with clutch hits a good many times. Some would argue that this indicates more about the lackluster Nationals than it does about Clayton, but I'd prefer to see Clayton swinging the bat than Russ Adams. What about John MacDonald? Great question, especially since MacDonald and Clayton appear to be players with similar abilities. Clayton has had fairly good success against LHP, so I expect that we'll see him platooning with MacDonald and Adams. As J.P. said, it will be a three-headed monster up the middle! (Clayton still has to prove himself--a situation he's quite familiar with--as J.P. has stated that he is not a shoe-in for the starting SS.) Sure, Lugo would have looked great on the field with the Jays, but starting pitching is the biggest need. If the team can save some money for pitching by signing the affordable and durable Mr. Clayton, plus get dependable offense vs. LHP and a mentor who can help Adams emerge as a true major leaguer, then we'll all look back on this trade positively. Thanks for your comment! I know Clayton's recent stats don't look great, and I would certainly agree that he's not the ideal fit at SS for the Jays, nor is he the SS of the future. However, I do think that we look better at the position for this upcoming season with Clayton on board than without.

Put it this way: Clayton wouldn't still be in baseball if he truly stunk. He's an average defender, with some speed around the base paths. Is his bat as bad as they say? His batting average is, well pretty average, and his OBP is not very good. But let's step outside the numbers for a minute… I listened to alot of Nationals games last season and Clayton came through with clutch hits a good many times. Some would argue that this indicates more about the lackluster Nationals than it does about Clayton, but I'd prefer to see Clayton swinging the bat than Russ Adams.

What about John MacDonald? Great question, especially since MacDonald and Clayton appear to be players with similar abilities. Clayton has had fairly good success against LHP, so I expect that we'll see him platooning with MacDonald and Adams. As J.P. said, it will be a three-headed monster up the middle! (Clayton still has to prove himself–a situation he's quite familiar with–as J.P. has stated that he is not a shoe-in for the starting SS.)

Sure, Lugo would have looked great on the field with the Jays, but starting pitching is the biggest need. If the team can save some money for pitching by signing the affordable and durable Mr. Clayton, plus get dependable offense vs. LHP and a mentor who can help Adams emerge as a true major leaguer, then we'll all look back on this trade positively.

Thanks for your comment!

]]>
by: Kman http://www.baseballfiles.com/player-acquisitions/blue-jays/jays-go-with-clayton-up-the-middle/#comment-943 Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:40:46 +0000 http://www.baseballfiles.com/player-acquisitions/blue-jays/jays-go-with-clayton-up-the-middle/#comment-943 Your more optomistic than us over in Jay land. We don't mind Clayton, but according to his stats it looked like he had a huge decline in defensive productivity. But $1.5 mill saves some money for some other spots. Is his bat as bad as they say? Your more optomistic than us over in Jay land. We don't mind Clayton, but according to his stats it looked like he had a huge decline in defensive productivity. But $1.5 mill saves some money for some other spots. Is his bat as bad as they say?

]]>